--- In [email protected], Duveyoung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > All the laws that Gore would have enacted would mostly, methinks, > be about forcing upstream pissers to keep it in their pants. > > What does it matter if the whole of human kind cleans up the > planet for the wrong reason -- how can there be a wrong reason > for that?
In fairness to the global warming skeptics, cleaning up pollution and combatting global warming overlap some, but they aren't synonymous. In other words, it's entirely possible to be in favor of cleaning up pollution *and* a skeptic on global warming. These aren't mutually exclusive.
