--- In [email protected], "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -- > There's no irrefutable proof either way, since worldwide weather > undergoes "natural" (without human intervention) cyclical changes; > and we don't know the exact extent to which human activities have > contributed to the current level of warming; OR, if the current level > will continue to disastrous levels. > The problem with your analysis, shemp; is that short of proof in > either direction, it's best to error on the side of caution.
I totally agree...with the priviso that the cost of erring on the side of caution doesn't itself cause damage. According to "Swindle" the damage that will be done to the poorest nations of the world will be absolutely horrible if the costs as outlined by the likes of Al Gore are taken. > > - In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > I must thank whomever it was on this forum that posted about "The > Great > > Global Warming Swindle" several months ago. > > > > This is probably the single most important documentary made in the > past > > 25 years and will undoubtedly have a huge impact upon public policy > in > > not only the United States but the world. > > > > I have shown the show, which I was able to obtain on DVD, to about > 4 > > different showings already; that is, to people who saw the Al Gore > > propaganda shit called "An Inconvenient Truth", and "Swindle" > leaves > > them with their jaw hanging. > > > > The DVD version will be updated (presumably to edit out the one > > interviewee, who appears for only 4 minutes of the 75 minutes who > said > > he was misrepresented) as well as lots of extras. > > > > Intolerants and elites, such as new.morning, would be well advised > to > > run, not walk, and get a copy. > > >
