--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On May 25, 2007, at 9:23 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> > > This just verifies what I've stated here numerous times, that
the
> > TM
> > > myth of physical stress release from the physical nervous
system
> > was
> > > fallacious. Where stress is being released is in the pranic
body
> > or
> > > vajra body. It is the pranic body that evolves.
> > >
> >
> > I don't understand the inconsistency between MMY's position,
your's,
> > and Muktananda's.
> >
> > Whether it's the "pranic body or vajra body" (although I'm not
sure
> > what "vajra body" is), isn't that still on the relative level?
> > Whether it's actual physical body or subtle, the stress (or
karma) is
> > still stored there and has to be released.
>
> Karma is what tradition would state, not "stress". Generally one
> would practice a technique to resolve the karmic eddies that
still
> exist in the pranic body. Once practicing such a technique, then
one
> can follow various signs to see how that's working. MMY's position
is
> a marketable one, that's all, otherwise it's utterly fallacious
and
> misleading. Muktananda just touches on some basics, but does give
an
> idea of what is involved.
>
Who cares? It works. That is the important thing. Otherwise, if we
tried to reach consensus on how it works, we'd still be stuck at
some series of inertia laden academic conferences, debating the
issue. Is that really preferable?
