--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "suziezuzie" <msilver1951@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <no_reply@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "suziezuzie" 
<msilver1951@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > > What these banks do is charge you all the interest up front. 
> > > 
> > > The banks are not front-loading interest. They are charging 
interest
> > > on a "pay-as-you-go" basis. That is, they are charging 
interest on 
> > the
> > > outstanding principal. No more, no less. As the principal 
declines, 
> > so
> > > does the interest on the remaining principal.
> > 
> > This is true for short term loans only, not 30 year fixed loans. 
> 
> Not true. The principle is the same. If you have a teaser low 
interest
> loan for the first 5 years, or an ARM, or other more complex loan,
> then its a slightly different structure -- but the principle is the
> same -- you pay interest on the outstanding principal. 
> 
> You and the author of the link you gave appear to feel that because
> initial interest payments are more than principal in the first 
years
> of the mortgage, that it is "front loaded". Thats an odd 
definition of
> front-loaded. Front loaded traditionally means paying MORE interst
> than is warranted by what is due on remaining principal. 
> 
> Create a payment and interest stream in Excel or Google SS and you
> will understand whats going on. 
> 
> I have put  an excel ss that mimics your case in the FFL files
> "Service". Actual interest does not sink to the level of principal
> until year 21. But that is NOT front loading in the traditional
> finance sense of the word.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > It appears on my statements that the interest IS frontloaded for 
> > example on a loan of $117,000, for two years now, I've paid 
$20,000 
> > in iterest and $3000 in principle. The $900 a month I'm paying 
is 
> > paying off mainly interest first for the first ten years 
> > (approximately). If I were to increase the principle amount of 
> > payback, they would recalculate the interest and it's true that 
a 
> > higher percentage of the principle would be coveredt. Mark
> > 
> > http://www.refinance-refinance.net/2006/04/10/mortgages-for-
dummies-
> > mortgage-term-length.html 
> > 
> > 
> > > For example, in the last boom phase of the real estate market,
> > > "interest only" loans were prevalent --- at least they 
> > were "interest
> > > only" for the first 5 years or so of the loan. Thus, for a 
$100,000
> > > principal, $6,000 of interst would be paid (assuming annual 
payments
> > > -- a simplification for this example.) For five years, no 
principal 
> > is
> > > paid off.
> > > 
> > > On the other had, a 30 year loan requires / allows the payment 
of 
> > the
> > > same interest as above, plus some repyament of principal, 
structured
> > > so that the full principal is paid off in 30 years. Again 
following
> > > the same principle, that interest is charged on the outstanding
> > > principal in each payment period. 
> > > 
> > > A 15 year loan pays back more principal each payment period. A 
5 
> > year
> > > loan even more so.
> > > 
> > > If you want to pay less interest, simply pre-pay down your 
principal
> > > each month. If the mortgage payment is $1000, pay that, plus 
$500/
> > > month principal paydown. You will end up shortening the term 
of the
> > > loan -- and end up paying less interest.

I am really astounded that anyone would get a loan without 
understanding the legal loan docs or having an amortization 
schedule. this stuff is very basic math and simple excel document 
stuff. Mortgage lenders are required to give you a "truth in lending 
statement". Anyone who gets a loan, signs a slew of legal docs, 
promissory notes etc. If you are mature enough to sign for a loan, 
it seems that you should know what it means. I am kind of tired of 
the big "wahhhh" about loans. Read before you sign. ASk questions 
before getting the loan. This is very very basic stuff. 
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to