--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@>
> > wrote:
> <snip>
> > > I just watched it again, and this time I noticed
> > > something kind of sad: even in the second half,
> > > there aren't any paintings of women of color. Maybe
> > > a couple are, but they aren't obviously so. There
> > > are plenty the creator of the video could have
> > > chosen from.
> > >
> > eh- probably would've been a little jarring to morph that way.
> we'll
> > save that for Gaugin (sp?) version...
>
> Don't know why it would have been jarring.
> That guy could morph *anything*. I think it
> would have been a wonderful touch. As Larry
> said so beautifully, one woman with many
> faces.
>
Come to think of it, why not go all out and do a morph with all
living things included? Anything with a face anyway...
