--- In [email protected], "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  In order for any currency to be acceptable, the issuing country 
has to show its potential or actual productivity, such as Gross 
National Product 

(The Raam will be backed by Consciousness, Pure Consciousness, 
Consciousness Pure)

which measures the goods and services produced and provided by a 
particular country.  If the Global Country can do this, then the 
> currency will have definite value in the financial markets.

(What we offer is the ultimate Good, and the Ultimate Service.  We 
offer the technology whereby no man or women need suffer again. The 
techology for every citizen to rise to his or her full potential)
> 
> At first glance, the measurable production that I could see would 
be the worlwide network of organizations under Maharishi's banner, 
such as the Maharishi Universities, the TM Organization, and the 
ayurvedic  products and services provided by branches of the TM 
organization.

(From our original World Plan we can now offer centers where the 
population can come for Ayur Ved, Staptya Ved, and courses offered 
by MUM. It is so beautiful) 
> 
> Also, the citizens of the Global Country should be using the Raam 
> currency for their own business transactions.  This will create 
the  value and acceptance of the currency. 

(Yes, it will be soon.  In this generation, when this knowledge will 
become established.  This Raam will be the concrete expression for 
the development of consciousness.  As consciousness grows, the Raam 
will increase in value.  If the citizens in any country grow more in 
consciousness, then their Raam will be worth more.  It is so 
beautiful)

 If not, the currency will only be worth the paper that its printed 
on.

(This will be the country that does not take up this technology.  Ha 
Ha Ha)

(lurk)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > No virus found in this outgoing message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> > Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.15/848 - Release Date: 
> 6/13/2007
> > 12:50 PM
> >
>


Reply via email to