--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of jim_flanegin
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 9:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Poverty is imaginary -- the 
individual is
> cosmic
> 
>  
> 
> > > > At the Global Press Conference on the Removal of Poverty 
> broadcast 
> > > > recently from the Global Financial Capital of New York, 
> Maharishi 
> > > > said that the true nature of life is affluence. Poverty is 
> imaginary, 
> > > > and every government can bring affluence to its people by 
> taking the 
> > > > Raam currency from the Global Country of World Peace. 
> > > 
> > You can read about other currency scams based on fake nations 
here:
> > HYPERLINK
> "http://www.quatloos.com/fake-
nations.htm#camside"http://www.quatloos.com/fa
> ke-nations.htm#camside
> > 
> > benny feldman isn't the first con artist to think this stuff up.
> >
> The only thing reading these messages from Maharishi and those 
near 
> to him literally will get you is frustration and confusion. Think 
a 
> little about what he has been teaching for 60 years (hint: 
> transcending), then re-read his words. The *new* meaning will be 
as 
> clear as day. I am not rationalizing what he says, just 
translating 
> it in a sense.:-)
> 
> But I don't think he's speaking in metaphors or parables. He 
literally wants
> people to accept the Raam, etc. He's tying that wish to people's
> understanding and experience that "the true nature of life (the
> transcendent) is affluence." People figure, "I know that to be 
true, and he
> knows it better than I (i.e., he's enlightened), therefore he must 
be right
> about this Raam stuff, and I'd better align myself with his 
thinking if I
> want to get enlightened too, and be a eligible to enjoy the coming 
Age of
> Enlightenment.
> 
You are right in my opinion about the "I'd better align myself with 
his thinking if I want to get enlightened too, and be eligible to 
enjoy the coming Age of Enlightenment" part. Btw, the reference to 
The coming Age of Enlightenment breaks the attachment to past and 
future.

He is not talking in parables, but there is a consistent energy 
signature underlying his words which tell the truth of his message. 
So those who are not living that level where the sustained energy, 
or darshan supporting his words is always obvious and available will 
be imprisoned in the surface level of his words. He doesn't mess 
around with this stuff. He is dharmically very much a kshatriya.:-) 


Reply via email to