In an idle moment I clicked on TMNews and a few more clicks led me to
Paul Mason's newspaper article on Linda Pearce on thr TMFree blog site
where I posted a few things.
Then I wondered this morning whether there had been anything on FFL
and a search proved right with usual scuffle over it.

I post now an amaglam of what I wrote on TMFree blog just in case
anyoine can stomach any more. 

I was in India with Linda, an attractive young girl. When she married
Peter Pearce I became godfather to their daughter. I can't comment on
the veracity of her assertions but find it hard to believe she would
make them if they were untrue. Poor girl seems to be a bit of victim
as Peter was a pathological liar and con man. We were for a brief
period partners in an art business so I know his ins and outs. I
gathered from Peter that Linda was a few years ago dying of MS in an
Indian village. For myself who was around Maharishi since 1962 I found
the stories of his behaviour startling as I never got a sense of him
being sexual. It is too bad it couldn't have been discussed as it
would be interesting to have a frank talk of sex and spirituality. It
seems the three temptations money, seems the three temptations money,
sex and power follow many of us up the ladder. 
David Fiske| Homepage | 06.14.07 - 7:44 pm | #

I did not mean to suggest that Peter Pearce invented Linda's story and
that as he is untrustworthy it isn't true. A charming chap but..!
Linda might have been charmed by him but I think she told that story
on her own.
I forgot to add that the South African Sunday Times carried a similar
report in which Linda said that when she tried to decline Maharishi he
told her not "to have sexual hang ups."

A letter this morning from Conny to me says his book on MMY has
secured a big publisher in Sweden and will tell all.
David
David Fiske | Homepage | 06.16.07 - 7:24 am | #

Sorry Paul I don't. It was sent to me after emigrating to Canada and I
seem to have lost it. At the time like you I dismissed it as it seemed
so improbable to me. However with so much directed at him it would
seem now most improbable that he wasn't a man like anyone else and
like many Indians who meet free moving western women untrained on how
to deal with them. One false step can lead to yet another and soon a
taste gets developed. Any person can feel lonely and all bodies need
caresses. Maybe he loved them as well.

I am so glad I never felt he was my guru, never had any. Yet he
remains someone who profoundly influenced my life, mostly positively
and for that he has my gratitude and very warm feelings of love.

Face dog I don't think he attracted a lot of conmen. I think he
attracted a lot of young people who felt inspired to feel that working
for him might well make a huge difference in the world. I once
complained bitterly, on my SCI course, that to the movement's
discredit their good intentions were used as a trap. As I had, I
suppose, some status the poor lad taking the course face fell.

I gather from Conny who has led a justified campaign against Sai Baba
that they have got Mark Landau to say Conny was hardly ever MMY's
secretary, only for 3 weeks. I guess trying to discredit him.

Somewhere I have a nice slide of Linda and Maharishi walking along the
path from his quarters to come to a meeting. I now wonder how many of
the young ladies I knew with him had encounters. Merilyn Jest? She and
I were close and for a while she was close to MMY. I think things fell
apart in her life.

It causes great grief that all those hard efforts from so many people
have ended up with a movement  about as far removed from any positive
influence as one could imagine. If  I were Maharishi I would feel
despair. He must self reflect like us all. I wish, like a good friend,
I could chew the cud with him as, late in life, he weighs up things..
love,
David

Reply via email to