Maybe, just say: You have Jesus, in your Heart, and  , and then,  
come over the border from Mexico, 
Se! Gracias.


- In [email protected], rama krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Hindu temples and religious groups in the US are ``reeling from 
visa denials'' resulting in shortage of temple priests and stalled 
temple construction projects, a Hindu group has said in an affidavit 
seeking changes to US immigration rules. 
> 
> In a submission to the United States Citizenship and Immigration 
Services (USCIS), a legal team for the Hindu American Foundation 
(HAF) said Hindu priests, temple artisans and traditional temple 
architects are increasingly being denied the R-1 religious worker 
visa because of US regulations weighed in favour of Judeo-Christian 
terminology. 
> 
> The brief maintains that defining eligibility for R-1 status using 
terms such as ``liturgical workers, catechists, cantors, 
missionaries, and ritual slaughter supervisors... may potentially 
serve to discriminate against those organisations that differ from 
the practice, structure and function of the Judeo-Christian 
guidelines upon which the regulations are based.'' 
> 
> ``From what defines a Hindu religious occupation, to whether a 
temple shilpi (Hindu temple stone sculptor) belongs to a particular 
denomination, the current terminology proposed by the USCIS is 
absolutely foreign to the Hindu tradition,'' said Suhag Shukla, the 
foundations legal counsel. 
> 
> ``As religious worker visas become more difficult to obtain for 
Hindus, Hindu Americans must insist that their voice is heard in this 
process no less than the fundamental right to a free exercise of 
religion is at stake.'' Scores of Hindu temples have come up across 
the United States in recent years, including some of the biggest and 
grandest outside India, resulting in a steep hike in demand for the 
so-called R1 religious worker visas. 
> 
> Some 10,000 such visas were granted last year, but US officials, 
saying the visas are being misused, have sought to tighten 
regulations. The HAF says it supports US efforts to combat 
immigration fraud, but USCIS should alter current definitions and 
regulations to encompass the diversity Hindu traditions and Hindu 
religious occupations. 
> 
> The HAF brief also expresses concern that the visa application 
backlog combined with a proposed initial one-year limit on R-1 visas 
places a substantial administrative burden on community run Hindu 
temples throughout the US. 
> 
> There are an estimated 60 major Hindu temples across US and scores 
of smaller ones. Many of the temples are multi-million dollar 
structures that have been designed and built by shilpis flown in from 
India. Large temples such as Chicago's Venkateshwara Temple, 
Pittsburg's Balaji Temple and Flushing, New York's Mahavallabha 
Ganapati Temple, Flushing are now part of the Indian-American pilgrim 
circuit. 
> 
> Grander ones are being built all the time, especially by large well-
funded organisations. Iskcon has embarked on a $61 Million Jagannath 
Cultural Project in Sedona, Arizona. Some time in the next few weeks, 
a grand Swaminarayan temple in Atlanta is scheduled to be inaugurated 
by Pramukh Swami Maharaj, head of the Gujarat-based Bochasanwasi Shri 
Akshar Purushottam Swami-narayan Sanstha (BAPS). 
> 
> Such intense activity has greatly increased the demand for R-1 
visas even as US immigration authorities have detected increasing 
irregularity, including false documentation and overstays. 
>    
>   
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/US_denies_visas_to_Hindu_priests_ar
tisans/articleshow/2121339.cms
>    
>   http://tinyurl.com/3x8vog
>                     var RN = new String (Math.random
());                  var RNS = RN.substring 
(2,11);                          var b2 = '
> ';                   if 
(doweshowbellyad==1)                                      
bellyad.innerHTML = b2;                                           
> 
>        
> ---------------------------------
> Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect.  Join Yahoo!'s 
user panel and lay it on us.
>


Reply via email to