--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jun 19, 2007, at 5:36 PM, authfriend wrote: > > > Vaj, you've made some high-sounding claims that > > you haven't even begun to document. <snip> > > Here are the claims I was referring to (as you > > know): > > > > "Mahesh holds incorrect views in regards to stages of > > meditation as described in the YS of Patanjali." > > > > "Actually ["modern science"] has [had an EEG > > definition of "legitimate" samadhi] since at least > > the 1950's. Interestingly this [definition of samadhi] > > is the same as traditional definitions and science has > > been able to verify the claims." > > Very good, yeah!
Yes, glad you agree. Now, the question is, why on earth would you make claims you knew you couldn't possibly support?
