--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > It's not the words, Curtis, it's the investiture.
> 
> More on "investiture," because it's an interesting
> metaphor to apply to Maharishi and the TM movement.
> 
> Almost everyone here "bought stock" in Maharishi and
> in the TM movement. Some of us signed on when it was 
> still a "startup company." We identified with the
> company's founder and its goals and thought that its
> products were the niftiest thing since sliced bread.
> So we *invested* in it -- our hearts, our minds, our
> lives (often to the point of giving up personal goals
> and dreams), our time, and in most cases a great deal
> of our money.
> 
> And then the company's stock started to slide. 
> 
> So many of the people here sold off their stock in the
> company and moved their investment elsewhere. They 
> might still have a fondness for the company and/or its
> founder, and most of them still identify with the
> company's original stated goals. But after one decade
> or two decades or even three decades of seeing those
> goals remain unrealized goals, and all of the talk of
> changing the world remain just talk, we bailed. 
> 
> In general, when someone posts something here that can
> be seen as critical of the company and/or its founder,
> the people who have "sold their stock" and are no longer
> "invested" in Maharishi and the TMO don't react in a 
> hostile or threatened manner. It's the company that's 
> being criticized, or the company's founder that's being 
> criticized, not them. When they "sold their stock" they 
> severed the connection that had made them believe for 
> a time that any criticism of the company or its founder 
> was criticism of them personally.
> 
> Some others have quit working for the company or never 
> worked for the company but *definitely* bought stock in 
> it. A few others still work for the company and are 
> still buying stock in it. 
> 
> Compare and contrast the way that these folks who are 
> *still* invested in the company react when it or its 
> founder are criticized. Not everyone does this, but I
> think it is safe to say that there is a strong tendency 
> for "current investors" to react as if any criticism of
> the TMO or Maharishi were directed at them personally, 
> even when it clearly is not. Being "stockholders" has, 
> for them, blurred the line between company and stock-
> holder such that any criticism of the company *IS* a 
> criticism of them, or worse, an outright attack.
> Ditto any criticism of Maharishi, the "CEO."
> 
> I stopped working for the company thirty years ago. I
> sold the last of my stock in it a couple of years later.
> If, as I suspect, the TMO "does an Enron" and goes
> completely belly up within five years of Maharishi's
> death, it's not really going to affect me in any way.
> I'm not an investor. It's not my company, and Maharishi
> is not my teacher. Big deal. So what.
> 
> But I have the sneakin' suspicion that if the TMO *does*
> "do an Enron" and vanishes from view as quickly as it
> appeared, there are quite a few "investors" who have
> been holding onto their stock all these decades who are
> going to have a hard time with that. If they can't tell
> the difference between criticism of the "company" and
> criticism of themselves, what are they going to do when
> the company kicks the bucket? Are they going to want
> to kick the bucket, too?
> 
> It's just a company. It's just stock. Whatever happens
> with it, or to it, it's not happening to you, only to
> something you invested in. On Wall Street investors tend 
> to realize this, and if the company they've invested in 
> starts to tank, they cut their losses, sell their stock 
> and move on. It seems to be only in the world of "spiritual
> investment" that people cling to the idea that once they've 
> invested, they have to hold onto their stock forever.

I have the same feeling Barry. And I worry about some of my long time
friends who are still heavily invested in the TMO and MMY. When the
movement implodes after MMY leaves town (I envision a financial tug of
war between various Shrivastava and Varma factions....those outside
the family don't have a prayer IMO) there may be a boom in mid and
late life crisis exit counseling in FF.

Reply via email to