--- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > My disagreements with MMY's perspective on human consciousness > > has nothing to do with emotions. > > I liked your recent post pointing out you were cutting slack to > Thai beliefs that you weren't to TMers', and so on. I think you > are on the right track with that line of inquiry. I also think > you generally try to be open, and I respect that immensely. As > I've said before, of the three pre-eminent TM "critics" here -- > you, Barry, and Vaj -- to me you your intellect feels the > most "transparent" -- FWIW.
FWIW, same here. That's why I get particularly annoyed when he falls back into that intellectually dishonest defensive mode when anything he says is challenged. > > This is a Vedic sounding poopy pants argument. Claiming to > > perceive "self-evident truth" reveals a lack of understanding > > of epistemology. Something that is, of course, self-evident to Curtis...
