--- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can't credibly deny that Bush & Cheney publicly pushed the > > idea > > > > > and claimed a connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not denying it. > > > > > > > > All I'm saying is that it wasn't this massive "over and over and > > over > > > > again" as you claim. > > > > > > > > > Yes. It was. There was much more that I didn't post. > > > > > > > > > > It was mentioned and, yes, it was a factor for claiming to go to > > > > war. And why not? It's true and, if anything, Bush didn't hype > > it > > > > enough, as is clear from the "evidence" that you presented to us. > > > > > > > > > No. It isn't and wasn't true. You're lying just like Bush & gang > > did. > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, since you were there in the room with everyone and don't have > > to rely on the public record as the rest of us do, I guess you know > > best. > > > The public record is very clear. You're lying.
Your public record if full of quotes of ambiguous statements and hypothetical and imaginary speculations...far, far from your claim that Bush "over and over and over again" tied Saddam to Al Qaida. And it's not a question of me "lying"...it's a matter of the reader to look at the quotes you drudged up to decide for themselves whether they back up what you said.
