--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "BillyG." <wgm4u@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > If you're aware *of* bliss as a "something," as > > > blissfulness, that isn't no thoughts/no mantra, > > > by definition. > > > > I think I see the problem now, you must remember that MMY's > > description of Samadhi includes *three* adjectives, it's Absolute > > (Sat, eternal without a second),
FWIW, the form 'sat' is the present participle of the verb 'as' (to be). Hmmm....just checked that out, in English the "-ing -form" is called present participle, and (it is called) gerund, too. Thus, in this case the present participle would be 'being'.
