--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" > <jstein@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > > > > > > <shempmcgurk@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > > > > Gore, equally, lives in a fantasy land where imagined > > > dangers > > > > > > > > > to the planet are concocted in his mind and > propagated > > > > > > > > > unremittingly by him to the public. Like the > Energizer > > > Bunny, > > > > > > > > > he goes on and on about global warming without any > > > concern > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > truth or the impact his words will have on others. > He > > > has > > > > > built > > > > > > > > > a fantasy wall around himself in which he -- and he > > > alone -- > > > > > > > > > cares about the world and all others be damned. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, no, in fact none of the above is true. > > > > > > > > Gore is very much in line with most current > > > > > > > > scientific thinking about global warming and > > > > > > > > has most of his facts straight, all the > > > > > > > > important ones, according to climate scientists. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And which climate scientists are those? > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=299 > > > > > > http://tinyurl.com/2e6vba > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yawn. > > > > > > > > > > Typical global-warming-fear-monger propaganda. > > > > > > > > > > I counted 11 scientists listed under the "people" link. > > > > > > > > > > Hardly a ringing endorsement. > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course Shemp ignores the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > The National Academies of Science represent the scientific > > > communities > > > > of 11 major nations of the world. > > > > > > > > Brazil > > > > Canada > > > > China > > > > France > > > > Germany > > > > India > > > > Italy > > > > Japan > > > > Russia > > > > United Kingdom > > > > United States of America > > > > > > > > *See their report* on Climate Change here: > http://tinyurl.com/3ykvyg > > > > > > > > AND, > > > > > > > > The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC] > > > > > > > > Recognizing the problem of potential global climate change, the > > > World > > > > Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations > Environment > > > > Programme (UNEP) established the Intergovernmental Panel on > Climate > > > > Change (IPCC) in 1988. It is open to *ALL* members of the > > > > UN and WMO. > > > > > > > > *See their report* on Climate Change here: > > > > http://www.ipcc.ch/about/about.htm > > > > > > > > Maybe you'd like to try to count how many scientists these > groups > > > > represent. Then maybe you could show 'your' side of the story by > > > > presenting a comparable body of scientists that don't come from > > > > either right wing conspiracy freaks or people or groups funded > by > > > Big > > > > Oil and acting as their shills. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ...and who is funding the organisations -- all political -- that > you > > > cite above? > > > > > > Why, governments, of course which are POLITICAL... > > > > > > And that makes their world-wide collective findings of the reality > of > > global warming illegitimate, HOW ????? > > > > > Uh, the same way that the collective findings of the unreality of > catastrophic man-made global warming is illegitimate on the part of > research funded by oil companies.
Uh... The oil companies have a clear incentive to dishonestly deny the overwhelming scientific research that claims that fossil fuel burning causes pollution that is contributing to global warming. Please elaborate on the incentive for the world's governments to publish consensus scientific data that shows global warming is indeed a danger caused by burning fossil fuels. > If you can explain that cause-effect relationship then you have the > answer to your question.
