--- In [email protected], "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > Actually my post focused on Jim's mischaractorizations concerning > the > > > blues and the men who invented the form, and his factual errors > > > concerning their lives. > > > > Brahman doesn't make mistakes. > > Ha! but Brahman is "complete" and includes opposites. Therefore in > order to be complete, Brahman must include making mistakes.
Perhaps He doesn't *make* anything. According to Vedaanta-suutra 1.1.2 janmaadyasya yataH (janma+aadi; asya; yataH) Prolly means something like The creation, and stuff, (brahmaa, viSNu and shiva?) of this *from which* (whom?) The relative pronoun /yataH/ (=from which, whom) obviously refers to /brahma/ in the preceding suutra: athaato brahmajijñaasaa (atha+ataH; brahma-jijñaasaa) Now, "certainly", (begins) investigation of (on?) Brahma(n).
