--- In [email protected], "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> wrote: > > > There is no path! There are no laws! The concept of laws and paths are > > part of the illusion! As is the notion of a state of perfection, > > ultimate or not, in the relative! > > The trick is to dispel the illusion, not just by denial of its > existence but by un-entanglement of the jiva/soul with it! Mere denial > is not enough, the residual samskaras (impressions in the mind) are > deeply rooted in the subconscious. > > Awareness of the one 'Reality' (God), at those subtle levels alone, > dispels the notion of duality/illusion, not till then. >
To describe realization as something at the end of a path is describing it from within a state of illusion in a - per definition - deluded way. The reasons for persising with such a description can be several. It can, for example, be the expression of a sincere seeker dong his or her best to describe what they see but keeps thinking they have not yet achieved. It can also be the description insisted on by someone who seeks to thwart attempts of immediate, effortless and spontaneous self-realization by just remembering who they are. Which is your excuse for putting up roadblocks?
