--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Rory Goff" <rorygoff@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> > > Sure doesn't sound *anything* like moodmaking to me. :-) > > > > No doubt :-) But then, you still think enlightenment is an > > experience > > No, not in the same way that eating an orange is an > experience, but one's *stories* about enlightement > and one's *interpretation* of enlightenment are > *very much* experiences, and *very much* stories. Dual attention and the duality of language can never contain the wholeness of nondual awareness. Words and stories will never be more than the crudest of descriptions of that which is known on the level of unbounded pure awareness.
