> On Jul 30, 2007, at 3:36 PM, jim_flanegin wrote: >> > This reminds me of what Rory said a few posts back about CC, GC and > > UC being transitory states.
--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yet this is just new age speculation. Au contraire, mon frere -- it is my direct experience :-) Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The tradition itself is very > clear on what "UC", videha-mukti, is and it is not a transitional state. If there is an "I" who is "in U.C.," it is very definitely a transitional state, with more (or less) to follow! :-)
