--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What can I say Jim. Other than you should ponder deeply the Steve > Mahvakya I quoted in an adjacent post. Ponder it until you REALLY get > it this time. > > But what can I say. You and Rory are the anti-Woks. > > Well, I sing to you "Wok on By". > > Cause we Wokers are getting ready to Wok on the Wild Side. Wok Round > the Clock.Lets Wok, everybody, lets Wok. > Everybody in the whole cell block
Bingo :-) Was dancin to the jailhouse Wok. but > tomorrow we will get up, fresh alert, ever creative, and Wok the Line. > Don't Wok on My Blue Suede Shoes. or spill some of Wokers favorite > wood on them: Wokamole. Well as they say "Wok, Don't Run". See you in > the akash, in the Wok. May the Wok be with you. > > Wok Wok Wok > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > What is can "could" > > > always be more divine, more and expression of heaven. if you or it > > > don't like that, then sure, leave it as it is. But if vision of what > > > could be has not been snuffed out within you, then seeing what could > > > and helpingto enable that change is a good thing, IMO. Wallowing in > > > yesterdays news (now is what was conceived yesterday) is not a huge > > > virtue, IMCO, unless you want to gloriify something then worship it. > > > Pesestalphelia. > > > > My sense when I read your words is that you are mistaking the > > elemental tamas associated with your thoughts with what Now is. Now > > lasts for less time than it takes to write the word, and encompasses > > all of the change, stability, upliftment, etc. that you want it to > > have. Now is a singularity in the midst of any direction of time and > > space you wish it to go. What is being said here is that to stand in > > Now and projecting it to a more perfect Then, does Now a disservice. > > > > This stickiness or tamas associated with thinking about Now is a > > natural function of ownership of thoughts, and conclusions, and > > suppositions. You see moving from that [tamas] as a great > > accomplishment, vs. staying with it something dead and sluggish. This > > view is due to the ownership of thoughts, and the desire for > > sattva/rajas to move away from that ownership, vs. an accurate picture > > of the perfection of Now. > > > > But seen from the perspective of a free mind this movement from Now to > > Then is not seen as desirable; Now is the true realm of all > > possibilities, whereas the desire to be Then is nothing more than an > > illusion.:-) > > >
