Great stuff!  Thank you.

**

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "matrixmonitor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ---Nope, I disagree with that viewpoint based on my experiences. 
> While everything is the Self, the real question is: does SBS "have" a 
> relative body which is real.  Of course, Jesus has appearned in 
> dreams to many people in powerful visions (as to me in 1996, with 
> living, vibrant messages which influence one's outlook for a long 
> time - even to this day); and similarly, Ramana Maharshi appeared to 
> be in an extremely powerful mind/blowing vision.
>  Critics of such experiences might claim that the entities in such 
> visions are merely "holograms" and thus not real; but that argument 
> doesn't hold water since everything is already a hologram.
>  The real question then becomes one of appraising the holograms and 
> most important the consequence and impact of the visions; not just 
> the fact that one had a vision or flashy experience.
>  We can use an analogy, the reports of the impact near death 
> experiences have on people.  Many people report that such experiences 
> are life transforming, with powerful positive influences on the whole 
> orientation of one's existence.  Likewise, powerful visions can 
> trigger deep but powerful transformations in the psyche which are 
> deemed to be spiritually of value.
>  SBS appeared to me in a powerful "real" experience in the dream 
> state in 1988; in which he initiated me into a Durga mantra.
> The true measure of what's real or not is not whether it manifests in 
> a vision (since everything is a vision); but the transformative 
> effects which ensue over the years.
>  But it's obvious that SBS is also a type of impersonalist all-
> pervasive Shiva.  So is a dirt clod.  Zen Koan: The Buddha is like a 
> dirt clod.  What's the difference?  On an absolute level, the dirt 
> clod is equally the Buddha.  On a relative level, there are subtle 
> transformative frequences of energy operating in multiple dimensions 
> across vast reaches of time and in unimaginably complex chains of 
> causes and effects; which allows the Buddha to be fully Absolute and 
> also to operate in countless Transformation bodies.  We don't see the 
> dirt clod operating in that respect.
>  Likewise, since SBS is no more Absolute than the dirt clod, there 
> must be something else - another component or aspect of life - which 
> enables the TM initiation to be effective; while having a picture of 
> a dirt clod during the initiation and bowing down to it; might 
> diminish the potency of the ritual.
>  Thus, the component SBS has, or radiates, is Shakti.  Dirt clods are 
> composed of Shakti but don't radiate much of it.
> 
> 
>  In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ron" <sidha7001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Again, it is my belief system being presented here, which 
> includes 
> > thinking what I have 
> > > heard from other Gurus to be correct.
> > > 
> > > I think Guru dev was an enlightened being, this means there is no 
> > greater or lesser among 
> > > the class of enlightened beings, and if he had disciples, then 
> > yes, a Sat Guru.
> > > 
> > > Those surrendering to him, nice gesture however when the ego is 
> up 
> > against a living Guru, 
> > <snip>
> > 
> > "was"? "had"? And I would challenge you to prove to anyone that 
> > Brahmananda Saraswati is not alive; far more *alive* than you are! 
> > 
> > Do you think He appears as if in a dream, and communicates 
> > abstractly with flowery phrases? What fantasy is this? He will 
> > destroy any remnant of your small self, faster than you can 
> imagine; 
> > immolate your illusions in the blink of an eye (with your devoted 
> > surrender and all consuming agreement, of course); bring the 
> > Almighty power of Shiva within you, and all with an intimate and 
> > personal love unsurpassed-- a relationship as real, sustained, and 
> > as consistent as any other you may have. This is my direct 
> > experience. 
> > 
> > What you have written here is based on some fanciful notion, and 
> has 
> > nothing to do with the vital, dynamic and living reality of Guru 
> > Dev. Until you know what you are talking about, it may be better to 
> > just watch and wait.:-)
> >
>


Reply via email to