--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "matrixmonitor" > <matrixmonitor@> wrote: > > > > I'll have to use the Golden rule in posting his [Jerry's] > > e mail address on any forum; personally, I wouldn't like > > it for myself; but OTOH I can't act as some type of > > intermediary. He's on his own! > > ...in regard to contacting Jerry, that's a > > great idea and IF his e mail is on some brochures he's > > going to send me on his Institute, then I will consider > > that as public information and post the e mail on this > > forum... > > Thank you for the updates, mm, and for your > discretion with regard to Jerry Jarvis. > > My personal feeling is that if Jerry has remained > inaccessible for this many years, and silent on > his reasons for it, that's the way he wants things. > And thus that's the way I'd want things to remain > for him. > > I can't imagine anything more annoying than being > pestered by people who want to know the "real" > story of his story. I can only imagine that he > has spent the years since we last saw him exactly > as many people here have spent them -- trying to > sort things out in his mind and coming to some > feeling of equanimity about them. Clearly from what > you have reported he still has positive feelings > about some of the things Maharishi is trying to > accomplish, and that's just fine with me. > > As much as many people might like to hear Jerry's > "take" on Things TM and want to ask him about it, > I think we already *have* it. It's called silence. > He's kept his for all this time, and I for one think > it might be rude to ask him to break it now.
Nice sentiments Turq.......ditto here!
