--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of shempmcgurk > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 11:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Jerry Jarvis's disassociation from TM org- > > > > > I have records of every check I wrote since I first got a check book, > which is about 28 years ago. And I have every receipt of every > expense I made since then as well. > > If I was: > > 1) getting a payoff for silence about having sex with someone; and > > 2) telling people (such as Rick Archer) that I was having sex with > that particular person > > ...then, yes, I would most certainly keep IN A SAFETY DEPOSIT BOX AND > HAVE DUPLICATES MADE of such checks. That would be, AT A MINIMUM, > what I would do. > > > > What would a bunch of old check stubs prove? How would they differ from the > check stubs thousands of other TM teachers would have if they had saved > them?
I got the impression from you that they were regular checks coming at regular intervals in the same amount. Perhaps it is me reading this into this situation but I would assume that would be the case with a pay off scheme. You don't agree to a pay off to keep someone silent by promising them intermittent checks for unspecified amounts. At least that's how it was done with LBJ's illegitimate kid. Of course, if it was a blatant blackmail situation on the part of Linda (which from what you tell us it certainly doesn't seem to be), the checks and the amounts WOULD be sporadic and would coincide with each time she called up to blackmail MMY...but this is obviously not the case here. If the assumption is correct that there were regular payments, then it would not be DIRECT evidence of a pay off but would certainly lend credence to the accuser's claims. And please keep in mind that it is Linda who is making the claims from her side. SHE is the accuser here and, therefore, the onus is on HER to provide evidence. For your other question of how would these checks differ from checks sent to other TM teachers? Well, for starters, most TM teachers, unless they were employed in administrative non-initiating positions, would not get regular paychecks in the same amount as typical employees would (we were self-employed contractors). Secondly, both TM teachers and those employed in administrative positions would have evidence of consideration provided by themselves for THEIR paychecks (i.e, initiations, evidence of working in an office, etc.). Those being paid off solely as a "pay off" would NOT have evidence of consideration. Indeed, there would appropriately be evidence of their work in OTHER areas (working for other employers, working as initiators or in TM administation positions, etc.). So, Rick, since you say that she does indeed, have records of the checks sent to her, this is what I'd like to know from Linda (and perhaps you can pass on to her via email these requests): What was the amount of the checks? How many were sent over what period of time? Are they still being sent (ie., is she still being paid off)? Did she pay tax on the payoffs? > > > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.6/938 - Release Date: 8/5/2007 > 4:16 PM >
