Judy, I don't think my record here would support anyone thinking that I have tossed my hat into the "Barry camp." In fact, he's called me on my shit more than anyone here, but he's always done it with a tender touch if you ask me. I try to be respectful of his "odd stuff," cuz GAWD I've got odd stuff too.
You, Judy, I've tried as hard as possible not to besmirch, cuz, I sure don't want any of the hot lead you throw at Barry. Why are you coming out so strongly when I am testifying, not to an opinion, but to an actual memory of mine? And why are you not commenting on John's name calling? If you respect John, then why are you supporting that kind of activity, I'd be the first to try to let someone I respected know how they're coming off and how at risk their reputation is. Didn't I actually pad my response with noting John's good qualities? Why such a forthright dumping of me when so clearly I was trying to give John a face saving "out?" Seems I've been rubbing you wrongly for some time now, and only now does the boil pop. And after I laid into Nab, you chided me on the lowness of my response, (and thanks for that, and yet, may I say, it was one of my finer put downs?) and I saw that as a correct admonishment of me, yet a "fuckhead" from John is not equally consider to be low by you? And you too now use the word with what I would call a very energetic power behind the use -- WTF? I did something so wrong that now you're fully loaded and coming out shooting? I'm trying to understand you. Honest to fucking hell! Judy, this is an actual situation where a lawsuit could be started, and you might find yourself spending a bit of dough just to answer the court documents served to get your explanation of your words here. Can you afford such a fight? I'm not saying you slandered me, cuz you were giving an opinion. John says plainly that I am a liar. Are you saying I'm a liar also? If so, give me your street address too! I don't care if I win. I just want to see the Judge's face when he has to process "John" and tries to see his side of the story -- after reading the posts of John with my yellow highlighting. That's the payoff for me -- seeing someone like John being honestly looked at by a Judge and knowing that everyone in the room agrees with the Judge. That's a very rare event in this world, and I've paid thousands upon thousands to get it. Stand back, Judy. I'm just that kind of guy who blows money like this. I paid my lawyer over six grand to watch me being deposed in my present lawsuit, and because we were so prepared, we both got to see the other side sweating profusely as point after point was lost by them, because we had our shit together and our facts were documented up the yinyang. They were made to be fools by their unpreparedness. Today, they'll trying to get a settlement negotiation underway. That's the kind of pleasure John is offering me now. Worth every dime to someone like me who's taken it up the ass way too many times. Someone has to stand up to trolls. Rick isn't doing it. Me, I'm just pissy enough. Yep. Edg --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Gang, let's take a vote! Who's a bigger liar and fuckhead? John or > > Edg? > > You're a bigger fuckhead by far (if at least partly > because you're into sticking your neck out and calling > attention to yourself). > > You get big fuckhead points from me--hypocrite > variety--because of your ongoing mutual ass- > kissing relationship with Barry, who's by far > the biggest fuckhead *and* liar on this forum. > > You also get hypocrite points for reacting to > John as you have after you laid into Nablus in > a significantly more vicious fashion than John > has gone after you. > > I've never known John to lie. > > I haven't seen any lies from you, but I haven't > "known" you for anywhere near as long. If I were > forced to choose between your word and John's on > something I didn't know anything about, I'd take > John's. > > I await the decision of the group. Right now, I'd say John'll > > get four votes automatically, but after that, he might be in for an > > onslaught of naysayers. I'm thinking I'm going to win, cuz I haven't > > been here long enough to stomp on many toes -- hee hee, but John, it > > seems you are a well known by many here -- are you on the thin ice I > > think you are? > > To my knowledge, there are three people here who > are familiar with John--Alex, Barry, and myself. > I don't think anyone else knows him any better than > you do; you both arrived, I believe, around the same > time. > > I don't know how Alex feels about John. Barry hates > him because John sees right through Barry's phony > act, as many others did on alt.m.t. > > I consider myself fortunate to have John as a friend. > It's a relationship that was forged in a great deal > of Sturm und Drang and is all the more valuable for > that. > > If you were to read a selection of his posts from > alt.m.t, you'd have a similar response to those you've > read here: some you'd like a lot, some you wouldn't. > Nobody here is 100 percent (either way). >
