--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> > > > wrote: > > > <snip> Kind of like the whole paradigm of enlightenment; I don't > > > > > know how it works, but it just does.:-) > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe you're dead wrong on this, Jim. The people you > mention > > > who > > > > may be living Brahman etc. > > > > > > There is no "may be" about it.:-) > > > > > > are doing it based on the TM techniques, > > > > NOT on "whatever he [Maharishi] is doing". You're conflating > > > > Maharishi's behavior with the techniques, and in the process > you're > > > > complicit in accepting "whatever he is doing". > > > > > > One hundred percent! Jai Guru Dev!:-) > > > > > > > It's very disturbing to me to see so many TMers not only make > > > excuses > > > > for Maharishi's behavior and not notice or care about it, but > > > worse, > > > > implicitly promote the idea that spiritual integrity doesn't > matter > > > > and isn't a part of the outcome of TM. > > > > > > > I don't know what else to say other than Brahman *is* spiritual > > > integrity, and Maharishi has, and many others have, attained > Brahman > > > by following him.:-) > > > > > > You're fooling yourself ... > > > Exactly-- there is no bigger fool than myself.:-)
What an accomplishment! How inspirational! Congratulations !
