Rick, Er, after a hundred posts from folks who seemed to agree to warn then penalize someone for flaming, I would think that you'd have warned Willy for his previous post. Now the one below seems to go way over the top into very obvious flaming.
Are you going to do this warn-then-ban bit? Edg --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > jstein wrote: > > I'd ask Barry to provide examples to the contrary, > > but there wouldn't be any point. > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143310 > > No, the above is what I actually wrote, citing Wilber, > and showing you to be a liar. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143497 > > As you know, Willytex, what I was calling Barry's fantasy > was *not* that Lenz had levitated. Liar that you are, you > omitted the context to make it seem that I had. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/140399 > > Your team of profligate liars and racketeers lost > in '06 and continues to lose. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/143504 > > Horseshit. > > Classics from the alt.m.t. Groove Yard > http://tinyurl.com/74d95 > > From Judy Stein to Willytex: > > Liar. > No, liar. > Wrong, liar. > Bite me, toots. > Non sequitur, liar. > Yes, it does, liar. > Willytex is a liar. > No, she did not, liar. > Yeah, it's a non sequitur. > As usual, Willytex is the liar. > Outright, deliberate falsehood. > Bob Dole is a liar, just like you. > Another right-winger bent on deception. > You've been lying your head off for months. > And that's just an outright, deliberate falsehood. > You snipped the context to obscure that fact, liar. > Boy, do you need a course in the fundamentals of logic. > > > His "opinion" about the general usage here of the > > term "liar" is also incorrect, in my observation. > > It's rare that someone is called a liar for merely > > expressing an opinion about someone else. If it > > does happen, it's likely to be because the person > > using the term knows that the person expressing > > the "opinion" has evidence that clearly documents > > the inaccuracy of that "opinion." >
