--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <drpetersutphen@> > wrote: > > > > > > --- boo_lives <boo_lives@> wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister > > > <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > IMO, he looks a bit sad or worried in most > > > > of these pics: > > > > > > > > http://www.paulmason.info/gurudev/photogallery.htm > > > > > > > > I guess he knew what the world would have to go > > > through > > > > during the 20th century. > > > > > > > Or how MMY would start selling supernormal powers > > > and Enlightenment at > > > $1 million a pop to spiritual gullible americans, > > > all proceeds going > > > into an offshore account in the jersey islands named > > > Brahmananda > > > Saraswati Trust, which finances real estate > > > development and lavish > > > lifestyles of the varma/srivasta clans. > > > > Slam dunk!! > > > I guess I never figured that Guru Dev is that weak, blind and stupid- > - > > That a saint who could make himself dynamically known to many after > his bodily death, who apparently organized a massive yagya to end > world war two, who manifested money out of the ether, who lived > unaided in the forest from the age of nine, would be incapable of > using his highly developed intuition to pick a worthy successor to > spread his message, one who he even provided with the mantras useful > for the world, on his deathbed? > > Of all those who he could of chosen, at his pinnacle of wisdom and > popularity as Shankaracharya of the North, of all of those attracted > to him, he choses someone who is greatly flawed, to destroy and cast > doubt on all of his work? > > Sorry, but I ain't buyin' it.:-)
For someone who justifies Maharishi's apparent amorality and is proud of being a self-proclaimed fool, it's no surprise.
