On Sep 13, 2007, at 1:49 PM, boo_lives wrote:

There is no evidence that GD choose MMY to be his successor - tmers
believe that based on what MMY has said not anything objective.
There's a huge decades long controversy over who GD's official jyotir
math successor was, where there is some record, and there's no record
at all regarding MMY. GD did not give MMY tm mantras - as has been
documented MMY started teaching TM in india with the mantra raam given
to everyone, later changed to bij mantras, and changed the criteria
for selecting bij mantras at least a couple times. The deathbed story
is believed by tmers and makes a great dramatic story. You can
believe whatever you want, as long as you understand you're using your
own spiritual movement's beliefs/stories/myths to support your
argument, which doesn't have much weight on those who aren't a part of
it. Every guru with a marketing orientation has a story about how he
is the official successor/reincarnation of/avatar of/ etc. of some
prior esteemed guru. Anti-tm people from GD's ashram have their own
stories about how GD warned the ashram about MMY's ambition and to
keep him on the business side and out of the teaching side of the
ashram, and how MMY fooled with the will, etc. That's their stories -
they have the same objective weight as TM TB stories.

MMY certainly has been successful in drawing in people to meditation
and in raising money. Still a pretty large group in ffld doing his
thing. I don't know if that says anything about GD or what he would
think about it.

I don't know much about GD from non TM sources. He appears to have
practiced a tradition called shri vidya. My personal opinion is that
GD's true lineage is being upheld by someone trained and selected
while GD was in the forest, not while in his public formal role as a
religious ashram leader.


Nice, brief objective synopsis.


Reply via email to