On Tue 23 May, Martin Kavka wrote:
> I haven't read the article, but this sounds bogus to me.
It is possibly bogus, and your explanation is just as feasible. I didn't
mean to pass judgement on what was said, just meant to paraphrase the
article a bit.
If I get the chance I'll transcribe the relevant bit word-for-word, but
I'm not sure I'll get the opportunity to do that in a hurry, sorry.
Stuart.
--
Stuart Bruce - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.atomiser.demon.co.uk
http://www.stuartbruce.co.uk
--
This message was sent through the Faithless Mailing-list.
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
UNSUBSCRIBE FAITHLESS in the body of the message.
