formtools.cfc is intended to be used by the internals of objectadmin. I'd
recommend against using it since it will probably be changed when we decide
to rewrite objectadmin.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Marco van den Oever <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So what's your opinion about get the data with structures, or with
> oFormtoolUtil?
>
> On Nov 24, 1:19 am, Marco van den Oever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > ahhhhww application.stCOAPI.xyz.packagepath, how simple can it be
> > huh ? :)
> > that for me was the missing link.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Nov 23, 11:23 pm, "Blair McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure what you mean by structures. You aren't using any in the
> > > examples you gave.
> >
> > > When instantiating a content type or rule you should use
> > > application.stCOAPI.xyz.packagepath. This will work for all rules and
> all
> > > types.
> >
> > > Regarding formtools, you should never have to reference
> > > farcry.core.packages.farcry.formtools. Everything you need is exposed
> via
> > > ft:object. To see how core uses it for edit forms you can have a look
> in the
> > > edit function on the types component.
> >
> > > Blair
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Marco van den Oever <
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > In my attempt to use as much structures as possible i am rechecking
> > > > code that is build with formtools, is it correct that using
> structures
> > > > is faster?
> >
> > > > Trying now to use structures instead of query's with:
> >
> > > > <cfset oFormtoolUtil = createObject("component",
> > > > "farcry.core.packages.farcry.formtools") />
> >
> > > > Is it correct that for rule table data you can't address without
> using
> > > > oFormtoolUtil?
> >
> > > > You can't connect with:
> >
> > > > <cfset obj = createObject
> > > > ('component',application.stcoapi.blablabla.typePath) />
> >
> > > > as it is not an type.
> >
> > > > You can't connect directly with:
> >
> > > > obj.getData(stobj.objectid) (or with additional properties)
> >
> > > > as the stobj.objectid refer to the rule table, so not directly to the
> > > > data i need.
> >
> > > > Even when it works out eventually then you might end up with a couple
> > > > of structures to do the same you can do with one oFormtoolUtil setup.
> >
> > > > What's your vision on this?
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"farcry-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
