What exactly are you trying to do? I can't tell what kind of problem you're
trying to solve.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:02 AM, Marco van den Oever <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So it really doesn't matter if i do it with setting structure keys for
> the sql statement or just like:
>
> <cfset props.whereclause="(abannerclients) IN (SELECT data FROM
> #application.dbowner#rulebanners_abannerclients WHERE
> #application.dbowner#rulebanners_abannerclients.parentid =
> '#stObj.ObjectID#') AND showstatus = 'onviews' AND viewsleft > 0" />
>
> It uses the same function so speed etc is the same ?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Nov 24, 3:28 pm, Marco van den Oever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Ok that is important to know, will change the code to structures.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > On Nov 24, 1:39 am, "Blair McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > formtools.cfc is intended to be used by the internals of objectadmin.
> I'd
> > > recommend against using it since it will probably be changed when we
> decide
> > > to rewrite objectadmin.
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Marco van den Oever <
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > So what's your opinion about get the data with structures, or with
> > > > oFormtoolUtil?
> >
> > > > On Nov 24, 1:19 am, Marco van den Oever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > ahhhhww application.stCOAPI.xyz.packagepath, how simple can it be
> > > > > huh ? :)
> > > > > that for me was the missing link.
> >
> > > > > Thanks!
> >
> > > > > On Nov 23, 11:23 pm, "Blair McKenzie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > I'm not sure what you mean by structures. You aren't using any in
> the
> > > > > > examples you gave.
> >
> > > > > > When instantiating a content type or rule you should use
> > > > > > application.stCOAPI.xyz.packagepath. This will work for all rules
> and
> > > > all
> > > > > > types.
> >
> > > > > > Regarding formtools, you should never have to reference
> > > > > > farcry.core.packages.farcry.formtools. Everything you need is
> exposed
> > > > via
> > > > > > ft:object. To see how core uses it for edit forms you can have a
> look
> > > > in the
> > > > > > edit function on the types component.
> >
> > > > > > Blair
> >
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:43 AM, Marco van den Oever <
> >
> > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > In my attempt to use as much structures as possible i am
> rechecking
> > > > > > > code that is build with formtools, is it correct that using
> > > > structures
> > > > > > > is faster?
> >
> > > > > > > Trying now to use structures instead of query's with:
> >
> > > > > > > <cfset oFormtoolUtil = createObject("component",
> > > > > > > "farcry.core.packages.farcry.formtools") />
> >
> > > > > > > Is it correct that for rule table data you can't address
> without
> > > > using
> > > > > > > oFormtoolUtil?
> >
> > > > > > > You can't connect with:
> >
> > > > > > > <cfset obj = createObject
> > > > > > > ('component',application.stcoapi.blablabla.typePath) />
> >
> > > > > > > as it is not an type.
> >
> > > > > > > You can't connect directly with:
> >
> > > > > > > obj.getData(stobj.objectid) (or with additional properties)
> >
> > > > > > > as the stobj.objectid refer to the rule table, so not directly
> to the
> > > > > > > data i need.
> >
> > > > > > > Even when it works out eventually then you might end up with a
> couple
> > > > > > > of structures to do the same you can do with one oFormtoolUtil
> setup.
> >
> > > > > > > What's your vision on this?
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"farcry-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
