Hi Geoff,

I know this is a site specific type of thing,
But do you have any recommndations for JVM settings?


2009/6/18 modius <[email protected]>

>
> On Jun 17, 2:44 am, Chris Roth <[email protected]> wrote:
> > There must be something I can do to root out the cause and improve the
> > performance. My "publishers" (two highlevel marketing dept reasonably
> > sophisticated users) are getting very frustrated and muttering things
> > like "Sharepoint" and "Frontpage" and other horrible things. They
> > really want to off load work to "Contributors" but there is no way
> > with the current performance of the webtop, I can start training them.
>
> A few things I might suggest for increasing performance of the webtop:
>  - upgrade to 5.1.5 (we are always adding performance tweaks as we
> find them)
>  - make sure the JVM is tuned; FarCry is designed to soak up memory,
> so its essential that the JVM has enough memory allocated
>  - make sure CF is tuned; turn on trusted cache!
>  - optimise the database; because applications vary so enormously its
> all but impossible to predict what indices will be required on
> database tables.  You must profile the database and add indices where
> needed -- for large data-sets this will have a potentially *enormous*
> impact.
>  - check the environment; things like disk fragmentation can have a
> significant impact on performance (especially if trusted cache is
> turned off)
>  - check table sizes for farLog and refObjects.  You may need to
> periodically truncate farLog and rebuild refObjects if the audit table
> is getting unwieldy.
>
> With respect to the tree, how many nodes do you have in the tree?  As
> Blair mentioned, 5.x has a new permissions structure that is built and
> cached for the tree.  This unfortunately means the initial tree build
> is relatively slow, but subsequent builds are very fast.  It may make
> a big difference if we put up a loading graphic indicating that the
> tree is building its cache rather than presenting users with nothing.
> Might be we have to rethink the caching model entirely for big trees.
> Let us know.
>
> All the best,
>
> -- geoff
> http://www.daemon.com.au/
>
>
> >
>


-- 
AJ Mercer
Web Log: http://webonix.net

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to