Correction - timings are averaging less than 0.05 seconds with caching, copy and pasted the wrong values.
The 0.01 timings were where the entire page was cached, but this is not really viable on a dynamic site. but less than 5 hundredths of a seconds is very quick. Chris. On Feb 17, 7:10 pm, Chris Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > Most of the time we see specific questions asked here, thought I would > add a performance tip to save your tiring web and database servers. > > Having used webskin caching in a limited way on existing sites with > some improvements in performance. > > I am now seeing the true benefit of webskin caching on a new FC6 > site. > > Some example average page speed, as indicated in the webtray > - without caching = average of between 0.4 and 0.5 seconds > - with caching = average of less than 0.01 seconds > > Yes that is less than one hundredth of a second with caching enabled > compared to almost half a second without caching. Same servers, same > pages, same content just one version with the FarCry webskin caching > switched on. > > This is all on a development server, but should get similar percentage > improvements on production servers. > > I know Geoff has said – “we are all using wekskin caching aren’t we?” > well if you are not you should look into it. > > Chris. -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
