Just thought, I think cacheTypeWatch is released in farcry 6 and
you're using 5.2.3 so it would not work for you.

Chris.

On Feb 24, 10:32 am, Chris Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
> Colin,
>
> Yes, adding something like
>     * @@cachStatus: 1
>     * @@cacheTimeout: 5
> is simple caching, refreshing after 5 minutes
>
> But for dynamic content you can also set the cache to check for new
> type content and then flush the cache if there is something new to
> display. Check out @@cacheTypeWatch, Geoff had a nice quick demo of it
> working on the AUS Winter Olympic site at last weeks cfmeetup Farcry 6
> presentation 
> -http://www.meetup.com/coldfusionmeetup/pages/Recordings_of_the_ColdFu...
> &http://carehart.org/cfmeetuprecordings/20100218_CF%20Meetup_%20FarCry...
> for the downloadable flv.
>
> As for fixing the conflict between setting content to approved and
> grabbing content for display - this will require a fix within farcry
> core code.
>
> Chris.
>
> On Feb 24, 10:15 am, Colin Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > We're not using webskin caching - just objectbroker caching of the
> > database requests.
>
> > Webskin caching caused us other problems with dynamic content, so we
> > never enabled it. (I'm assuming you mean View Caching described 
> > herehttp://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/UNIT+08+-+Object+Broker,+Vi...
> > )
>
> > We have narrowed it down to that final "submit" for approval on the
> > screen that asks you for the approval comment.  If we run without load
> > up to that point, then load the page requests for that page just prior
> > to pressing the final submit, it loses all the rules on the page.
>
> > On Feb 24, 9:31 am, Chris Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > Colin,
>
> > > Sounds like some form of locking should be put in place - i.e. do not
> > > allow nj:display to get content item whilst set status to approved
> > > (statustoapproved) process is in in progress for that same item.
>
> > > Are you using webskin chaching, if not it might be worth looking into
> > > if you are not, The cached version of the webskin may (have not
> > > tested) still be available for display whilst the content item is
> > > being approved. Not sure, without looking, what the sequence of events
> > > are when approving content - i.e. does the full DB update complete
> > > before the webskin cache is cleared?
>
> > > Chris.
>
> > > On Feb 24, 8:37 am, Colin Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi we've just encountered a major problem when trying to edit our
> > > > (busy) homepage.  We have various rule containers on there, but if we
> > > > create a draft version - even just to change some metadata on the
> > > > page, then send it to approved we're frequently losing several rules
> > > > from the page randomly.
>
> > > > This appears to be directly related to this 
> > > > bughttp://bugs.farcrycms.org/browse/FC-523
> > > > which does not appear to have a fix.  We are currently running 5.2.3
> > > > of farcry.
>
> > > > We can replicate it every time on dev and test by running jakarta
> > > > jmeter against the page to simulate continual requests.  If the page
> > > > is edited while the page is being requested continually any or all the
> > > > rules on the page end up disappearing.  Obviously this is a major
> > > > problem for us and the editors, as we could be randomly losing content
> > > > all over the site, and people may not even notice it's gone
> > > > immediately.
>
> > > > If anyone has any ideas on how to fix this they'd be greatly
> > > > appreciated!
>
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Colin.

-- 
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry

Reply via email to