Hi Colin

This is an issue we've had as well. It happens because FarCry creates empty
containers for pages that don't have any in the DB. While FarCry is busy
migrating the draft page to live ... for a very brief moment the page is
empty. We fixed the problem in FC6 by removing the automatic creation
process. Now containers are ONLY created if a user views a page in rule
editing mode.

Blair

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Colin Jones <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Chris - I think we have also narrowed it down to core as
> well...
>
> We've tried two independent websites using FarCry - totally different
> projects on different servers, the other one running 5.2.7 of core,
> and have been able to successfully replicate this behaviour simply by
> loading requests on the page while approving in the webtop.  Sometimes
> you have to go through the 'draft/approve' loop a few times before it
> happens, but it doesn't take long before you lose the rule containers
> on the page.
>
> This is obviously a very serious core bug, as changing a page
> (particularly the homepage) on a site with heavy traffic means that
> you can lose every rule on it - clearly something that is likely to
> affect the homepage more often than others by the nature of traffic
> patterns.  Editing rules themselves has no effect, and you can happily
> change those without this behaviour manifesting.  Seems to be just
> moving a draft version of the page itself to approved causes it -
> which seems to link it back to that bug again... :(
>
> Problem is this is severely knocking the confidence of our editing
> team in the system... they are already printing out copies of things
> because they feel that it isn't reliable!
>
> (PS: Thanks for the info on caching, but as performance hasn't been a
> problem, we're not pursuing that at the moment - this however we have
> to find some resolution to!)
>
>
> On Feb 24, 10:32 am, Chris Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Colin,
> >
> > Yes, adding something like
> >     * @@cachStatus: 1
> >     * @@cacheTimeout: 5
> > is simple caching, refreshing after 5 minutes
> >
> > But for dynamic content you can also set the cache to check for new
> > type content and then flush the cache if there is something new to
> > display. Check out @@cacheTypeWatch, Geoff had a nice quick demo of it
> > working on the AUS Winter Olympic site at last weeks cfmeetup Farcry 6
> > presentation -
> http://www.meetup.com/coldfusionmeetup/pages/Recordings_of_the_ColdFu...
> > &http://carehart.org/cfmeetuprecordings/20100218_CF%20Meetup_%20FarCry.
> ..
> > for the downloadable flv.
> >
> > As for fixing the conflict between setting content to approved and
> > grabbing content for display - this will require a fix within farcry
> > core code.
> >
> > Chris.
> >
> > On Feb 24, 10:15 am, Colin Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > We're not using webskin caching - just objectbroker caching of the
> > > database requests.
> >
> > > Webskin caching caused us other problems with dynamic content, so we
> > > never enabled it. (I'm assuming you mean View Caching described
> herehttp://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/UNIT+08+-+Object+Broker,+Vi.
> ..
> > > )
> >
> > > We have narrowed it down to that final "submit" for approval on the
> > > screen that asks you for the approval comment.  If we run without load
> > > up to that point, then load the page requests for that page just prior
> > > to pressing the final submit, it loses all the rules on the page.
> >
> > > On Feb 24, 9:31 am, Chris Kent <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > Colin,
> >
> > > > Sounds like some form of locking should be put in place - i.e. do not
> > > > allow nj:display to get content item whilst set status to approved
> > > > (statustoapproved) process is in in progress for that same item.
> >
> > > > Are you using webskin chaching, if not it might be worth looking into
> > > > if you are not, The cached version of the webskin may (have not
> > > > tested) still be available for display whilst the content item is
> > > > being approved. Not sure, without looking, what the sequence of
> events
> > > > are when approving content - i.e. does the full DB update complete
> > > > before the webskin cache is cleared?
> >
> > > > Chris.
> >
> > > > On Feb 24, 8:37 am, Colin Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Hi we've just encountered a major problem when trying to edit our
> > > > > (busy) homepage.  We have various rule containers on there, but if
> we
> > > > > create a draft version - even just to change some metadata on the
> > > > > page, then send it to approved we're frequently losing several
> rules
> > > > > from the page randomly.
> >
> > > > > This appears to be directly related to this bughttp://
> bugs.farcrycms.org/browse/FC-523
> > > > > which does not appear to have a fix.  We are currently running
> 5.2.3
> > > > > of farcry.
> >
> > > > > We can replicate it every time on dev and test by running jakarta
> > > > > jmeter against the page to simulate continual requests.  If the
> page
> > > > > is edited while the page is being requested continually any or all
> the
> > > > > rules on the page end up disappearing.  Obviously this is a major
> > > > > problem for us and the editors, as we could be randomly losing
> content
> > > > > all over the site, and people may not even notice it's gone
> > > > > immediately.
> >
> > > > > If anyone has any ideas on how to fix this they'd be greatly
> > > > > appreciated!
> >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Colin.
> >
> >
>
> --
> You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google
> group.
> To post, email: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, email: 
> [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]>
> For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> --------------------------------
> Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
>

-- 
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry

Reply via email to