I agree about removing the alias functionality, but unfortunately we still
have clients who use it. Regarding your proposal - the code is in the works
at the moment, but will have to go into trunk since there are DB changes
involved.

Blair

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:38 PM, Jeff Coughlin <[email protected]>wrote:

> It's not a bug.  This is the way the feature was designed many years ago
> (FarCry 1?).  What it does is deceiving and mis-labled (it confuses every
> one of my clients.  They end up going and creating all these confusing
> aliases.  In my opinion ALIASES SHOULD ONLY BE USED BY DEVELOPERS AND CAN
> ONLY BE SEEN BY SYSADMIN ROLES - sorry for the strong emphasis there :) ).
>  It isn't redirecting the user anywhere.  All it does is brings in the child
> element's content into the calling nav node's location.  Confusing?  You
> bet.  But it does have it's place (although very rare and IMO pointless).
>  Imagine this: you have multiple sitelets all under the same home tree
> (something one of my clients did once).  Each sitelet wants to have an
> "about us page" but they want to share the same content.  This is the only
> scenario I've ever come across where I've used this feature.  Personally, I
> think it should be pulled, but it's been in there for ages.
>
> So... I modified the current web project I'm working on for a client to add
> a new redirect feature in dmNavigation.  Now what the person does is select
> from a library picker (ftType="uuid") and the page gets redirected.  It
> works really well and the client loves it (it just "makes sense" to them
> because it does it "the FarCry way" - something they're already used to.
>  They find it very intuitive).  I've also added a few extra features.  I
> made the proposal to Daemon and they liked it, but so far I don't think it
> has gone anywhere.  So for the moment my client is using a hacked tree.cfc
> in core (since that file can't be extended - I have a bug for that in the
> bug tracker).
>
> If you want to read more about my proposed changes (and trust me, it works
> really well so far in the one project I'm using it on) then check out this
> suggestion page I made and tell Daemon your thoughts (note: currently I've
> only added options 2 and 3 to my client's website since that's all they
> really needed):
>
> http://docs.farcrycms.org/display/FCDEV50/Nav+Node+Mod+Screen+Changes
>
> --
> Jeff Coughlin
> Web Application Developer
> http://jeffcoughlin.com
>
> On Jun 2, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Blair McKenzie wrote:
>
> > I believe it should be setting the redirecting navigation node as the
> page's apparent location. If that isn't happening I would say it's a bug.
> >
> > Blair
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Michael Sharman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > I was wondering if the logic behind "redirecting" to an existing
> > navigation node has changed recently.
> >
> > My understanding is that I may have an "About" page in my primary
> > navigation, but I also have a utility navigation area (in the footer
> > for example). In this footer nav I want to link to the existing
> > "About" on the footer nav node in farcry.
> >
> > I thought it would behave as if I actually clicked the primary "About"
> > link, what's happening though is it's loading the correct page but
> > with the navigation of /footer/about instead of simply /about. This
> > seems incorrect and not good for SEO.
> >
> > Can anyone shed some light on the "official" workflow for dmNavigation
> > redirects?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > --
> > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google
> group.
> > To post, email: [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, email: 
> > [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]>
> > For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> > --------------------------------
> > Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google
> group.
> > To post, email: [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe, email: 
> > [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]>
> > For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> > --------------------------------
> > Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
>
> --
> You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google
> group.
> To post, email: [email protected]
> To unsubscribe, email: 
> [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]>
> For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
> --------------------------------
> Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
>

-- 
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry

Reply via email to