I always thought they got deleted as well, but maybe I'm wrong. Blair
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Michael Sharman <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > We're running farcry 6 and ran into an issue today which was a little > strange. Basically an editor had deleted a dmNavigation node last > week, but all the content underneath that node is still there and > accessible on the front end as long as you know the friendly URL. > > What is the "official" behaviour in this regard? If I have any objects > underneath a dmNavigation node (even if it's a dmHTML page) are they > (or should they be) removed when the dmNavigation is deleted? > > We can see child content in the following tables which I would have > assumed would have been deleted: > > nested_tree_objects > refObjects > dmNavigation > dmNavigation_aObjectIds > farFU > dmHTML > etc > > -- > You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google > group. > To post, email: [email protected] > To unsubscribe, email: > [email protected]<farcry-dev%[email protected]> > For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev > -------------------------------- > Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
