On 10/09/2010, at 8:50 AM, Michael Sharman wrote: > What is the "official" behaviour in this regard? If I have any objects > underneath a dmNavigation node (even if it's a dmHTML page) are they > (or should they be) removed when the dmNavigation is deleted? > > We can see child content in the following tables which I would have > assumed would have been deleted: > > nested_tree_objects > refObjects > dmNavigation > dmNavigation_aObjectIds > farFU > dmHTML > etc
It should delete the primary node, its children and then its children's children.. etc until all are gone. Its possible that some auxiliary references like FU's are not being cleaned up (we'd consider that a bug). The only things I can think of are: a) its in the TRASH branch; and needs to be deleted by someone with the right privileges b) the delete failed to complete for some reason and the content still exists but was orphaned from the tree. There is a utility in the ADMIN area that allows you to reattach orphaned nodes -- and then attempt the delete again. Hope that helps, -- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/ skype. gb.daemon -- You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group. To post, email: [email protected] To unsubscribe, email: [email protected] For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev -------------------------------- Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
