Are these changes also in head? My patch level is reporting as 6.1.0,
and I think it's about 2 months old now (from head).
On 9/5/2011 2:28 AM, Geoffrey Bowers wrote:
On 05/09/2011, at 12:44 PM, Matthew Williams wrote:
I've got a site that has 65k products up for sale, and to bring
execution time down I started using objectbroker cache more than I've
ever done since it came into existence. I've run into some memory
issues, and I've narrowed it down to dmHTML objects in the cache.
What version of Core are you running?
We recently added some very significant changes to the way that Core handles
memory management and by extension objectbroker caching. Haven't had a chance
to write all this up, but if you run the latest milestone for the p600
maintenance branch you will have it all in place.
Brief version... we have refactored memory management in FarCry to use "soft
references". This has the effect of allowing normal garbage collection in the JVM
to throw out the cache when ever it needs to ie. in the event that memory on the box is
tight. Prior to this change, large FarCry sites could get a lot of memory bottlenecked
up in OldGen, that effectively never goes.
Anyway... upgrade to 6.0.15+ and let us know how you go.
-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
skype. gb.daemon
twitter. @modius
--
Matthew Williams
Geodesic GraFX
www.geodesicgrafx.com/blog
twitter.com/ophbalance
--
You received this message cos you are subscribed to "farcry-dev" Google group.
To post, email: [email protected]
To unsubscribe, email: [email protected]
For more options: http://groups.google.com/group/farcry-dev
--------------------------------
Follow us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/farcry
