This is just an addition to the "policy" discussion regarding FU's.

We don't want FU's everywhere on the site we are developing.  So - for the
time being - we have turned them off.

We only really wanted FU's on specific portions of the site (such as the
home page of one of our offices ........ /go/someoffice) and had been
building the site based on using the navalias for this purpose.

But it seems as though (the current verion, at least, of) FarCry doesn't
work this way with FU's.

But Spike's org.uk site seems to work something like this (meaning he has
a mix of FU's and non-FU's).

I suppose I have some confusion now over what the recommended use of FU's
is for FarCry and whether or not it is the right mechanism for us to do
what we want.

I would be just as happy to go back to something like
......./goto.cfm/someoffice.  In which case I would located "someoffice"
in the nav tree by looking up the navalias which would give me the
objectID.



Gary Menzel
Web Development Manager
IT Operations Brisbane -+- ABN AMRO Morgans Limited
Level 29, 123 Eagle Street BRISBANE QLD 4000
PH: 07 333 44 828  FX:  07 3834 0828

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2003-10-24 12:39:10:

>
> Hi,
>
> We have just implemented Friendly URLs on our development server.
> Once each on two different pages the secondary navigation had a mix of
unrelated
> FU links plus a couple of the correct ones, although the labels were all
correct
> - eg the "Reports" nav object linked to "About Us" but the "Pathways"
object
> correctly linked to "Pathways". On leaving and going back to the page,
the links
> were fine.
> I haven't been able to replicate the problem since - everything seems to
be
> working - but has anyone experienced something similar?
> It's possible of course that our nav templates are temperamental.
>
> On FU policy:
>
>    It's not particularly necessary for all links on a site to use FUs,
is it? If
>    the navigation templates simply have the buildlink tag, then we are
pretty
>    much covered? Our main aim is search engine visibility.
>    Not that log files are much help to us with our firewall, but will
using FUs
>    mixed with objectids tend to upset page view results? Even so, they
help, in
>    that our current log analyser is not dynamic page friendly.
>
>    I don't suppose there is any harm in setting up full buildlink
references in
>    all templates and then deploying individual FUs at your leisure? I'm 
assuming
>    that FUs can be set manually in the text file - is it only through
"Reset all
>    friendly URLs" that the FU file is updated by FarCry?
>    We have pretty much stuck with the /images  /index.cfm /files
pattern, but
>    not in all places. I suppose an answer is to do the FUs
incrementally,
>    checking each page before adding it by hand to the list. Which in our
case is
>    a lot of pages eventually.
>
>    The best policy would be to use either an ordinary link based on the
objectid
>    or a buildlink, but not use FUs in any way hard coded within the site
or in
>    publications. This will mean educating our contributors not to use
the FUs.
>    Would it be worthwhile having an option to turn off FUs when logged
in and
>    browsing the site?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Natalie
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



****************************************************************************
If this communication is not intended for you and you are not an authorised
recipient of this email you are prohibited by law from dealing with or
relying on the email or any file attachments. This prohibition includes
reading, printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, storing or in
any other way dealing or acting in reliance on the information.  If you
have received this email in error, we request you contact ABN AMRO Morgans
Limited immediately by returning the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and destroy the original. We will refund any reasonable costs associated
with notifying ABN AMRO Morgans. This email is confidential and may contain
privileged client information. ABN AMRO Morgans has taken reasonable steps
to ensure the accuracy and integrity of all its communications, including
electronic communications, but accepts no liability for materials
transmitted. Materials may also be transmitted without the knowledge of ABN
AMRO Morgans.  ABN AMRO Morgans Limited its directors and employees do not
accept liability for the results of any actions taken or not on the basis
of the information in this report. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited and its
associates hold or may hold securities in the companies/trusts mentioned
herein.  Any recommendation is made on the basis of our research of the
investment and may not suit the specific requirements of clients.
Assessments of suitability to an individual's portfolio can only be made
after an examination of the particular client's investments, financial
circumstances and requirements.
****************************************************************************


---
You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to