That's helpful. Would 500 nodes under one node be a problem?
Well if you are literally saying 500 under a single node then yes.. this would cause the javascript tree UI to behave terminally slow as it wouldn't render the level until data was collected for all the underlying nodes at that level.
However, if what you really mean is 500 nodes within a single branch of the tree -- you shouldn't have any trouble at all. The tree is designed to load only one level at a time on demand. You can also ZOOM to specific areas of the tree reducing the clutter in the UI.
If for whatever reason you absolutely had to have 500 nodes at a single point, then the underlying storage model is fine. Its just the Javascript tree UI that would be causing you grief. And of course with farcry you could build a custom admin interface to handle your specific interface requirements.
-- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/
--- You are currently subscribed to farcry-dev as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
