On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 22:06:32 +1000 Nigel Sim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am wondering what people think about having a default pt-map installed > in rtpbin, which would contain the RFC3551 defined payload caps. This > would be nice as it would mean less setup for people using standard > transport protocols and mapping, and it would also allow gst-launch and > gst-python programs to again use rtpbin. (Neither of these can pass > GHashTables, thus can't set up the bin). Good idea. But... a last patch I added to rtpbin is to drop any incoming packets that are not in the pt-map table as a way to ignore certain packets (in this case CN packets that are not yet supported). I think this feature is useful since you don't want to receive packets you cannot support and you can define this with the pt-map table. In other words, if the pt-map is set, it will use that one. If no pt-map is set, it will use the default one. I will do it. Thanks, Philippe > > -- > Nigel Sim > > High Performance Computing > James Cook University > +61 7 4781 4247 > +61 409 277 641 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Farsight-devel mailing list Farsight-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/farsight-devel
