>From: Roozbeh Pournader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 14:22:19 +0430 (IRST) > >You did not say anything about Normalization. That's more than correct. >But the only reason for not allowing U+06C0 in the standard, is its >cannonical decomposition. That weighs down all other reasoning. BTW, I got >the idea from Unicode. Where else? ;) I was not referring to allowing or disallowing U+06C0 either. I still don't know what you are talking about. >I have read all your posts, and I think they should have been >informational for some of the subscribers. But I am mainly talking about: > > http://lists.sharif.edu/pipermail/farsiweb/2002-May/000266.html > >Which I replied with: > > http://lists.sharif.edu/pipermail/farsiweb/2002-May/000267.html In this message I made reference to two group of people: those who were trying to tell us "how to write the <ezafeh>", and those were now trying to tell us "how to write the <hamzeh>". In the first instance I was referring to a lot of people in general, who have this kind of attitude, not necessarily those on this mailing list. Perhaps all those who drafted the IT standard fall into this category, I woldn't know. In the second instance I was specifically referring to a message posted by Khanban. I think that he got my meaning, and gave a reply to it, so that makesus even. >and again: > > http://lists.sharif.edu/pipermail/farsiweb/2002-June/000276.html This is a long one. I will have to get a printout and read it more carefully before giving you a reply. Abi _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp. _______________________________________________ FarsiWeb mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/farsiweb
