Hi Dario, my live performences center around plugins coded for Reaper. I had no need to do live coding so far. Large feedback networks are handeled in FAUST without the caos easily generated in PD patches and without block-delay; FAUST has no "hard time" doing so.
It may take some time to figure out the diagram. If you are stuck translating PD patches to FAUST feel free to ask. -- Urban Schlemmer - Diplomtonmeister -\\ - Formation supérieure aux métiers du son (FSMS) -\\ www.dsp.guru > Gesendet: Montag, 03. Juni 2019 um 16:35 Uhr > Von: "Dario Sanfilippo" <sanfilippo.da...@gmail.com> > An: "Faust users" <faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Betreff: [Faudiostream-users] Faust as a main developing tool for composers > and performers? > > Hi, list. > > I'm just curious to know if you're aware of any electronic music > composers/performers who work with Faust as their main tool to implement > their works. > > Also, was Faust originally born as a tool for engineers? Have you always > taken into account the possibility of Faust becoming a developing > environment for musicians? > > Of course, it is already possible, as I'm doing it, but I wonder if the > development of Faust takes into account the point of view of the musician > as much as that of the engineer. > > When I initially asked around, I had been warned that Faust may have a hard > time compiling large recursive networks. I have already worked with some > fairly large networks without problems but I haven't ported all of my PD > patches yet. Has any of you ever reached that point? > > Thanks, > Dario > _______________________________________________ > Faudiostream-users mailing list > Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users > _______________________________________________ Faudiostream-users mailing list Faudiostream-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/faudiostream-users
