I did anyhow so hopefully that was right! I felt this way when I came out of tort last time and I got it. Onto company now is right.
On Sep 29, 2:57 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys in Q 5 was it appropriate to go over the mens rea i.e. hyam, > maloney, etc.? Confused as hell with it all. > > On Sep 29, 2:43 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi... > > > Wow, that was an exhausting paper. I was happy enough with it though. > > I was delighted that there was something on the definition of crime > > and something on omissions, they were what I really hoped for. Then I > > did the two four-part questions and the provocation question too. The > > difficult thing with criminal now is that you have to be prepared to > > write a five page essay on some weird angle of the topic (eg the quote > > in the provocation question was a bit nuts) or you could end up just > > writing a page or so in a four-parter. It'd break your heart. I really > > hope I get the magic 50% > > > Anyway, on to company now... > > > On Sep 29, 1:13 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hey, > > > > What did everyone think of criminal? They fairly shoved in everything > > > they could didn't they?! The questions were very busy I think. I just > > > put down anything that seemed relevant. By the time you have read the > > > questions tho and gather your thoughts it does not leave much time for > > > writing!- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
