My first one too. Was v nervous this morning but so happy to have first one over with.
I did mention criminal negligence too in respect of the doctor. So much information in the questions and found it took long time to read them all, in order to decide which ones to do... On Sep 29, 5:07 pm, aviationhead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did the same as you so lets hope that we are somewhat on the right > track then!! > > As for the Omissions question, did anyone mention the possibility of > Criminal Negligence Manslaughter charges being brought? > > And Yeah all of the questions were quite busy alright. It was my first > FE-1 and I now know why everyone says its impossible to > know how you do!! > > On Sep 29, 3:29 pm, tiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Oops didn't write any of that stuff. Concentrated on criminal damage, > > assault causing harm (indirect). oh well, nothing can be done now. > > > On Sep 29, 3:26 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The one with Lennie in the cherry picker and Jason the 14 yr old > > > > On Sep 29, 3:19 pm, stripey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Which one was question 5? > > > > > On Sep 29, 3:10 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I did anyhow so hopefully that was right! I felt this way when I came > > > > > out of tort last time and I got it. Onto company now is right. > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:57 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Guys in Q 5 was it appropriate to go over the mens rea i.e. hyam, > > > > > > maloney, etc.? Confused as hell with it all. > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 2:43 pm, Fern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi... > > > > > > > > Wow, that was an exhausting paper. I was happy enough with it > > > > > > > though. > > > > > > > I was delighted that there was something on the definition of > > > > > > > crime > > > > > > > and something on omissions, they were what I really hoped for. > > > > > > > Then I > > > > > > > did the two four-part questions and the provocation question too. > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > difficult thing with criminal now is that you have to be prepared > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > write a five page essay on some weird angle of the topic (eg the > > > > > > > quote > > > > > > > in the provocation question was a bit nuts) or you could end up > > > > > > > just > > > > > > > writing a page or so in a four-parter. It'd break your heart. I > > > > > > > really > > > > > > > hope I get the magic 50% > > > > > > > > Anyway, on to company now... > > > > > > > > On Sep 29, 1:13 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > > What did everyone think of criminal? They fairly shoved in > > > > > > > > everything > > > > > > > > they could didn't they?! The questions were very busy I think. > > > > > > > > I just > > > > > > > > put down anything that seemed relevant. By the time you have > > > > > > > > read the > > > > > > > > questions tho and gather your thoughts it does not leave much > > > > > > > > time for > > > > > > > > writing!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
