Good Morning. Thanks for the info Doodles. Just one question; When you say that 'Re Stead' was highlighted as a possibility under Secret Trusts, does that point to a question more on co-ownership issues than perhaps a more general discussion on prior / post communication of intention?
On Oct 1, 8:11 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He said 90% chance as out of the last 9 papers it has come up 7 > times. But, as always, nothing is guaranteed it's just going on the > law of averages so it's entirely up to yourself. > > On Oct 1, 7:38 pm, James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Any particular reason reason he has recission/undue influence down as > > a 90% chance? It's come up the last two papers hasn't it? > > > On Oct 1, 7:19 pm, Doodles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm glad you asked as I was about to . .. the following were > > > highlighted for us in Independent: > > > > Maxims > > > Either Quia Timet, mareva or anton pillar > > > specific performance > > > undue influence/recission (90% chance) > > > complete constitution (may be a full Q) / stong v bird > > > secret trusts (maybe re stead) > > > charitable trusts / cy-pres > > > quistclose trusts / joint deposits > > > property rights of co-habitees (only a feeling with the lecturer but > > > Griffith also had a Q on their mock paper so they must have a feeling > > > too) > > > trusteeship > > > > On Oct 1, 7:13 pm, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > What is everyone doing for equity?- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
