I was gonna pull ya up on that one but said i'd let it slide! -Have sep of powers down pretty well Jud v Leg/Exec v Leg/Exec v Jud and a good load of cases etc, -Art 38.1/Natural rights/due course of law -40.3 and at least 1 case for most of the rights, -Cabinet confidentiality/Ag v Hamilton -Art 37 -Property 'unjust attack' etc/Religion/ -Inviobility of dwelling/unconst obtained evidence. -'Family/Children/Education/Marriage -Expression/Association -Effect of a finding of unconstitutionality -Locus Standi -pros and cons of Art 26 Prob one or two other loose ends.What I'm not doing is parliamentary privilege (spelling), Euro conv on HR, Taoiseach/AG etc, International law etc,constituencies etc, and other shitty parts.
Reckon my ass is covered.I'd be v unlucky if there's not 5 Qs i can do. On Oct 2, 5:14 pm, "Keane C.J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > correction td v minister for justice > > On Oct 2, 1:31 pm, "Keane C.J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > cheers gaffer yes td v minister to education, the cramming is getting > > to me! > > > On Oct 2, 9:25 am, the gaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Is it not TD v Min for Ed?Doesnt matter anyay. It's to do with Sep of > > > Powers.Only Oireachtas can decide what to do with State's money > > > (Art11).In this case the HC orderes a special psychiatric facilty or > > > something to be built for a young fella as no such facility existed in > > > the country.SC on appeal overturned that order saying it was't for the > > > judiciary to direct the Oir on how to spend State's money. > > > > Re Solicitor's Act goes hand in hand with McDonald v Bord na gCon.If > > > you have to mention one,chances are the other is also > > > relevant.They're to do with Art37 (where a body other than a court has > > > made a decision that you don't agree with and it affects your > > > rights,or so you think)This Art allows ltd fnctns of a judicial nature > > > be carried out by non courts... > > > McDonald-First of all it must be ascertained if the body was > > > exercising a judicial fnctn in the first place:Was body dealing with a > > > dispute as to the existence of legal rights/obligations?; Does its > > > decision impose legal duties/penalties?;Is its decision final?;Is the > > > State bound to enforce its decision?;Is the fnctn one traditionally > > > carried out by a court in Irl? > > > If these are answered "Yes", proceed to Re Solicitors Act... > > > Now that we know the body was exercising a jusicial fnctn,Art 37 says > > > this is only allowable by a non court once the decision was not > > > related to criminal matters (straightforward) and it must be limited > > > inits effect. To find out if the decision is ltd in its effect, ask > > > "does the decision have a most profound and far reaching effect > > > affecting the life,liberty,fortune or reputation of the person against > > > whom it was directed" If the answer to this is "Yes" then the action > > > by the body who made that decision was unconst in breach of Art 37 (It > > > was exercising a judicial fnctn ,which is allowed (McDonald), but it > > > wasn't of a ltd nature) > > > > Easy! > > > > On Oct 1, 10:35 pm, "Keane C.J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > td v minister for justice brought a number of ground breaking > > > > judgments on resource based issues to a halt as they identified socio > > > > economic rights??that correct??? > > > > > also re solicitors act case regarding limited judicial function > > > > confuses me ?? > > > > > would appreciate if one could expand on the following issues. > > > > > cheers closer to exam the more confused im getting!! > > > > > On Sep 29, 5:44 pm, "Keane C.J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > wats up all, im doing all the griffith topics in the manual minus, > > > > > preamble, president, nation,thing is there is so much in it im worried > > > > > il forget cases but i got 45 in last exam which i crammed for and am > > > > > thinkin its sort of a waffley subject what do u all think?? any > > > > > predictions on what might come up??- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
