Hey there I have a very question that may be very silly, in relation to the one judgment rule under Art 34.4.4 and in relation to the article 26 procedure, i.e. Casey suggests that by not disclosing or publishing dissents, it inhibits the development of constitutional jurisprudence.
Why then do notes and books refer to certain judges (dissenting) and in the judgments of more than one judges are available when you read the original judgment. Am I missing something really basic??!!! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1 Study Group" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
