it was definitely one of the toughest eu papers, let alone blackhalls
I have ever sat - and i've sat all of them besides tort.
Noel travers deserves an absolute kicking right in the behind for the
type of questions he puts up. I would be absolutely positively shocked
if more that one handful of people could satisfactorily answer the
case note question - having learnt 10 "seminal cases" from all across
the course, you would think one be covered - not could I do one.
The direct effect question was all over the place.
Part A of the competition law question was one of the most confusing
questions I have ever read. The fact that Mr. Travers thought it
prudent to give "nicknames" to almost every relevant party ("stayers",
"goers", etc etc etc).
I have no problem with a testing paper - having covered all the
course, I truly can say I was not happy with one question I attempted
today.
It's funny these exams are set by people who have never have been
within an asses' roar of having to study/sit a blackhall.
On Apr 3, 3:01 pm, tiger <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I thought it was fairly bad as well. plus, the commission question - I
> wrote an awful lot from the treaty. Don't know whether I can get any
> marks for that.
>
> The article 82 question was tough too - the dual role? Anyone know
> what that was about?
>
> On Apr 3, 2:58 pm, molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > God,that was crap. Only got to do 4 quetions and The question on free
> > movement of goods was completely bizarre, Could not figure out its
> > relevance to that area at all. I mean fixing tinted stickers or
> > whatever to car windows? How does that restrict the free movement of
> > goods? Kept looking at it thinking I must be missing something.
>
> > On Apr 3, 1:39 pm, Richard Power <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > good bit off work not whole course but a alot of study and prob for
> > > nothing!!!
>
> > > last one aswell and was hoping bhall but may have to wait.....
>
> > > the paper was all on the difficult aspects of ec law, the one on direct
> > > effect took about an hr to understand!!!
>
> > > > Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 05:26:45 -0700
> > > > Subject: EU Post Mortem
> > > > From: [email protected]
> > > > To: [email protected]
>
> > > > I found that paper really tough - it was my last exam and I think I've
> > > > completely screwed my chances of going to B'hall this year -
>
> > > > Can someone explain what question five was all about please? I had no
> > > > idea how the second and third parts related to FMG?!!
>
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Get 30 Free Emoticons for your Windows Live
> > > Messengerhttp://www.livemessenger-emoticons.com/funfamily/en-ie/-Hide
> > > quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "FE-1
Study Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.ie/group/FE-1-Study-Group?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
